1. Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55: 5–14. [PubMed]
2. Luthans F. Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Acad Manage Exec. 2002;16: 57–72.
3. Luthans F, Youssef CM. Human, Social, and now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organ Dyn. 2004;33: 143–160.
4. Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO, Li W. The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Manage Organ Rev. 2005;1: 249–271.
5. Luthans F, Norman SM, Avolio BJ, Avey JB. The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate—employee performance relationship. J Organ Behav. 2008;29: 219–238.
6. Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Optimism, pessimism, and psychological well-being In: Chang EC, editor. Optimism & pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association; 2001. p. 189–216.
7. Masten A, Reed M. Resilience in development In: Snyder CR, López SJ, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 74–88.
8. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004;86: 320–333. [PMC free article][PubMed]
9. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1998;124: 240–261.
10. Becker G. Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical approach with special references to education. 3rd ed Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1993.
11. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital (1986) In: Szeman I, Kaposy T, editors. Cultural theory: An anthology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2011. p. 81–93.
12. Newman A, Ucbasaran D, Zhu F, Hirst G. Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. J Organ Behav. 2014;35: 120–138.
13. Avey JB, Reichard RJ, Luthans F, Mhatre KH. Meta‐analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human resource development quarterly. 2011;22: 127–152.
14. Larson M, Luthans F. Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitudes. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2006;13: 75–92.
15. Luthans F, Avey JB, Patera JL. Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital. Acad Manag Learn & Edu. 2008;7: 209–221.
16. Avey JB, Hughes LW, Norman SM, Luthans KW. Using positivity, transformational leadership and empowerment to combat employee negativity. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2008;29: 110–126.
17. Avey JB, Patera JL, West BJ. The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 2006;13: 42–60.
18. Hobfoll SE. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6: 307–324.
19. Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Avey JB, Norman SM. Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Pers Psychol. 2007;60: 541–572.
20. Baron RA, Franklin RJ, Hmieleski KM. Why entrepreneurs often experience low, not high, levels of stress: The joint effects of selection and Psychological Capital. J Manage. 2016;42: 742–768. doi: 10.1177/0149206313495411
21. Judge TA, Watanabe S. Another look at the job satisfaction-life satisfaction relationship. J appl psychol. 1993;78: 939–948.
22. Dawkins S, Martin A, Scott J, Sanderson K. Building on the positives: A psychometric review and critical analysis of the construct of psychological capital. J Occup Organ Psych. 2013;86: 348–370.
23. Snyder CR, Sympson SC, Ybasco FC, Borders TF, Babyak MA, Higgins RL. Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70: 321–335. [PubMed]
24. Scheier MF, Carver CS. Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychol. 1985;4: 219–247. [PubMed]
25. Wagnild GM, Young H. Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. J Nurs Meas. 1993;1: 165–178. [PubMed]
26. Parker SK. Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: The roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. J Appl Psychol. 1998;83: 835–852. [PubMed]
27. Lyubomirsky S, King L, Diener E. The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success?Psychol bull. 2005;131: 803–855. [PubMed]
28. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL, Feldman Barrett L. Psychological resilience and positive emotional granularity: Examining the benefits of positive emotions on coping and health. J Pers. 2004;72: 1161–1190. [PMC free article][PubMed]
29. Jundt D, Hinsz VB, editors. Are happier workers more productive workers? The impact of mood on self-set goals, self-efficacy, and task performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago; 2001.
30. Lyubomirsky S, Tkach C, DiMatteo MR. What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem. Soc Indic Res. 2006;78: 363–404.
31. Little LM, Gooty J, Nelson DL. Positive psychological capital: Has positivity clouded measurement rigor In: Nelson DL, Cooper CL, editors. Positive organizational behavior: Accentuating the positives at work. London: SAGE Publicatios Ltd; 2007. p.191–209.
32. Ford MT, Heinen BA, Langkamer KL. Work and family satisfaction and conflict: a meta-analysis of cross-domain relations. J App Psychol. 2007;92: 57–80. [PubMed]
33. Rojas M. The complexity of well-being: A life-satisfaction conception and a domains-of-life approach. Researching well-being in developing countries: From theory to research. Paper presented at the international workshop on researching well-being in developing countries, Delmenhorst; 2004.
34. Lucas RE, Diener E, Suh E. Discriminant validity of well-being measures. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71: 616–628. [PubMed]
35. Judge TA, Klinger R. Job satisfaction In: Eid M, Larsen RJ, editors. The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. p. 393–413.
36. Pavot W. The assessment of subjective well-being In: Eid M, Larsen RJ, editors. The Science of Subjective Well-Being. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008. p. 124–140.
37. Culbertson SS, Fullagar CJ, Mills MJ. Feeling good and doing great: The relationship between psychological capital and well-being. J occup health psych. 2010;1: 421–433. [PubMed]
38. Avey JB, Luthans F, Smith RM, Palmer NF. Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. J occup health psych. 2010;15: 17–28. [PubMed]
39. Avey JB, Luthans F, Jensen SM. Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Hum Resour Manage. 2009;48: 677–693.
40. Diener E, Seligman ME. Very happy people. Psychol Sci. 2002;13: 81–84. [PubMed]
41. Karademas EC. Self-efficacy, social support and well-being: The mediating role of optimism. Pers Indiv Differ. 2006;40: 1281–1290.
42. Symister P, Friend R. The influence of social support and problematic support on optimism and depression in chronic illness: A prospective study evaluating self-esteem as a mediator. Health Psychol. 2003;22: 123–129. [PubMed]
43. Ozbay F, Fitterling H, Charney D, Southwick S. Social support and resilience to stress across the life span: A neurobiologic framework. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2008;10: 304–310. [PubMed]
44. Seligman ME, Parks AC, Steen T. A balanced psychology and a full life. Philos Trans-R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004: 1379–1382. [PMC free article][PubMed]
45. Cartwright S, Holmes N. The meaning of work: The challenge of regaining employee engagement and reducing cynicism. Hum Resour Manage R. 2006;16: 199–208.
46. Coutu DL. How resilience works. Harvard Bus Rev. 2002;80: 46–56. [PubMed]
47. Baumeister RF. Meanings of life. 1st ed New York: Guilford Press; 1991.
48. Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Taris TW. Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2008;22: 187–200.
49. Bakker AB, Gierveld J, Van Rijswijk K. Succesfactoren bij vrouwelijke schoolleiders in het primair onderwijs: Een onderzoek naar burnout, bevlogenheid en prestaties [Success factors among female school principals in primary teaching: A study on burnout, work engagement, and performance]. Diemen, The Netherlands: Right Management Consultants; 2006.
50. Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB. Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J Vocat behav. 2009;74: 235–244.
51. Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Schaufeli WB. The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. Int J Stress Manage. 2007;14: 121–141.
52. Luthans F, Youssef CM, Avolio BJ. Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. 1st ed New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
53. Emmons RA, McCullough ME. Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84: 377–389. [PubMed]
54. McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang J-A. The grateful disposition: a conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc psychol
The positive core construct of psychological capital (or simply PsyCap), consisting of the psychological resources of hope, efficacy, resilience, and optimism, has recently been demonstrated to be open to human resource development (HRD) and performance management. The research stream on PsyCap has now grown to the point that a quantitative summary analysis of its impact on employee attitudes, behaviors, and especially performance is needed. The present meta-analysis included 51 independent samples (representing a total of N = 12,567 employees) that met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated the expected significant positive relationships between PsyCap and desirable employee attitudes (job satisfaction, organizational commitment, psychological well-being), desirable employee behaviors (citizenship), and multiple measures of performance (self, supervisor evaluations, and objective). There was also a significant negative relationship between PsyCap and undesirable employee attitudes (cynicism, turnover intentions, job stress, and anxiety) and undesirable employee behaviors (deviance). A sub-analysis found no major differences between the types of performance measures used (i.e., between self, subjective, and objective). Finally, the analysis of moderators revealed the relationship between PsyCap and employee outcomes were strongest in studies conducted in the United States and in the service sector. These results provide a strong evidence-based recommendation for the use of PsyCap in HRD and performance programs. Theoretical contributions, future research directions, and practical guidelines for HRD conclude the article. Gallup Polls in recent years suggest that Americans are pessimistic about incremental